tirsdag, april 24, 2007

"Hot town, summer in the city "

"Back of my neck getting dirty and gritty". Følelsen idag selvom det måske er at stramme den lidt. 18-22 grader i København. Foto© Snaphanen.

"Australians 'the worst Muslim haters in the world'?
Ridley, det omrejsende Stockholm- syndrom, har været down under. Det forløb (heller) ikke gnidningsfrit: (foto© Snaphanen)
Recently it was revealed that radical Muslim academic Sheikh Bilal Philips had been denied a visa to attend a Melbourne University conference. One of the attendees, British journalist and Islamic commentator Yvonne Ridley, subsequently “accused Australians of being among the worst Muslim haters in the world”. This despite the fact that Bilal was refused entry by the Government apparently on the advice of national security agencies, and not as a result of any community protest.
Ridley is a visitor to this country, not that she felt constrained to exercise any of the customary courtesies one might expect from a guest. Like the film stars who pronounce Australia a wonderful country before they have exited the arrivals hall, Ridley has hit the ground running. Though it is not her first visit to these shores, her comments were at best intemperate and more likely a slander.
Some segments of the population will no doubt be grateful for Ridley’s unsolicited advice, but for the vast majority of us it is not only a slur but also a statement of gross ignorance. According to her, our criminal record as Islamic haters is getting worse by the year. “I've visited over 20 different countries in the last three years and Australia is the most shocking in terms of deterioration,” she said.
Let’s guess at some of those 20 countries.
Germany? There the guest-worker program has brought Islamic ethnic tensions to a boiling point.
Denmark? Nearly half of Danes consider Islam incompatible with democracy, and the devastating results of the Prophet Mohammed cartoons persist as an open wound.
France has burning cars, riots and an ongoing controversy over the veil.
The Netherlands is now well known for its nasty debate over its growing Muslim population, and a far-right party calling for a halt to Islamic immigration has gained a foothold in Parliament.
Two-thirds of Swedes question whether Islam is compatible with Western society, and the Muslim Council of Britain claims that little progress had been made to stop Islamophobia in the last ten years.
And that’s just a small part of Europe. Need we look further? Has she also visited North America, Africa, the Mediterranean, or the former Soviet Union? [..]

Ridley should first get her facts straight. Australia is not a nation of Islamophobes.........The Australian

Dagens tørklædeskænderi
se JP opinion. Hvorfor ikke bare lade venstrefløjen selv om at skændes med sine nye legekammerater ?

"Racism and sexual frustration"
The racist reality of the Arab psyche would never accept black and white people as equal.
Racism was an integral part of Saudi society. My students often used the word “nigger” to describe black people. Even dark-skinned Arabs were considered inferior to their lighter-skinned cousins. I was living in the world’s most avowedly Muslim country, yet I found it anything but. I was appalled by the imposition of Wahhabism in the public realm, something I had implicitly sought as an Islamist.

"Sarkozy og Segolene"
hedder det i DR, som er på fornavn med deres favoritkandidat:

Dagsnytts skuffelse over at Segolene Royal tapte var ikke vanskelig å spore. Det er ingen tvil om hvor NRKs nyhetsavdeling befinner seg. Men for å opprettholde verdensbildet må Sarkozy svartmales og Royal forskjønnes.
Det sies at det er duket for en klassisk venstre-høyre duell. Det er feil. Den er ikke klassisk, den er tvertimot noe radikalt nytt i europeisk politikk. Derfor var valgoppslutningen rekordstor.
NRK, Aftenposten og de fleste norske medier er på Royals side. De vil det gode. Men det at de konsekvent unnlater å beskrive hva kampen står om, er med å svekke deres sak: de møter seg selv i døra, for deres standpunkt forutsetter at de ignorerer hva det dreier seg om.
Det er Sarkozy som polariserer. Situasjonen er ikke polarisert. Det er samme holdning som over alt ellers: skyt budbringeren. Det er Frps, Hege Storhaugs og Anfindsens skyld.
Jeg skrev at dette er første gang at innvandring og nasjonal identitet preger et valg. Det er ikke riktig. Det første var Danmark i 2001. Til tross for at det er vår nordiske nabo er det fortiet og fortegnet. Danskene er utropt til rasister og fremmedfiendtlige.[..]

Det er ikke skribenter som Karen Jespersen og Ralf Pittelkow som polariserer, men de som benekter og sier de deltar i et korstog.
Valgene i Europa vil i årene fremover bli styrkeprøver mellom en nasjonalliberal oppvåkning og et sentrum-venstre preget av ønsketenkning. Som med Royal vil det ligge mye idealisme bak. Man må ikke betvile den ekte frykt for polarisering og brutalisering som mange av Royals tilhengere føler. De er også redd for fremtiden, hvis Sarkozy kommer til makten. Men de forveksler idealer og virkelighet, vil jeg påstå. De tar feil av alle de fine ordene og ønskene og en utvikling som for hver dag som går bringer oss lenger vekk fra dem.
De forveksler behovet for en brutal oppvåkning med brutale metoder. Mange står klar til å selge dem det budskapet.
View Guestbook Sign Guestbook
Powered by iguest.net